|
As the main system of rural public goods \, Regarding a proposed system for the deepening of rural infrastructure , reduce the burden of rural areas , promoting grassroots democracy , and to ease the contradiction between the cadre has played a certain role , but , regarding a proposed system implementation also experienced a lot of problems example, lower government execution , the system is relatively rigid , inefficient use of funds , poor villagers wishes to express enthusiasm is not high , etc. . The normalized main reason lies in the system itself . The purpose of this writing is that perfect \Empirical analysis in the course of the study , combined with typical cases occur in P County , summed up the problem \rigid and lack of oversight mechanisms ; and analysis of the causes of the problem from three angles of the government , the third sector of the market, combined with the above-mentioned problems , the limitations of government , lack of market participation and the third sector participation is not sufficient . For the above problems and causes , the main use of the multi-center governance theory put forward recommendations for improvement : analysis from the government perspective , first , the government should tax and fiscal reform , the second , the government should improve the supervision mechanism , and the third , to market and third sector involvement adjust relevant policies ; analysis from the market point of view , first , the introduction of market competition mechanism , second , to organize the villagers to provide the operators of public goods through social cooperation ; from the third sector perspective , the first play of the third sector role as a bridge between the villagers - Government \
|