|
Restrictions on the powers of the executive authorities should start with both internal and external, are indispensable, therefore, administrative support and recognition of the growing number of scholars homemade as one of the support for democracy and the rule of law. Chief homemade is not self-limiting the administrative organs subjective sense, more sense of the administrative acts of the executive authorities for the construction of an institutional and administrative authority legitimate and reasonable application of this goodness system, and comprehensive legislation The implementation of the system has played a role of escort. Performance evaluation as a government self-restraint, self-improvement, self-pursuit of good governance as a means to get a good practice in many countries, and the Government Performance assessment of the legal system, institutionalization has become a trend in many countries in the development of performance evaluation system. Currently, many domestic legal scholars, people from the legal point of view, relatively sophisticated performance assessment legislation introduced in detail, and useful exploration of the relevant legislation, the major papers, Dr Chao \Assessment gt; Review of \Government performance evaluation system origin has been a long time in the United States, and in 1993 enacted the Government Performance and Results Act, is the first worldwide comprehensive specification of the Government Performance Evaluation legal representative legislative government performance evaluation field Clinton administration reform, has become the key to success. The GPRA characteristics can be summarized as the universality of the applicable organization specific construction, the operational flexibility of the assessment results-oriented, strategic planning length combined, the progressive nature of the Act applies. Strategic planning, annual performance plans, annual performance report must be within the prescribed time, to the provisions of the program submitted to Congress, and Congress understand the government work, and timely guidance and improve government performance. As a result, the U.S. Government Performance Reform rapid advance. Japan with the United States have some of the same point has its own character. First, government performance evaluation object certain areas, major Japanese assessment of the various government departments in the assessment of the specific areas of research and development, public utilities and government development assistance. Secondly, a greater focus on to play the role of experts and scholars in government performance evaluation process. Again, Japan in the assessment process to the public, and more emphasis on transparency. Finally, in the way of policy evaluation is not to generalize, but according to the assessment of different matters, the options have relied on. At present, the domestic legislation in the field of government performance evaluation is relatively empty, but some government departments and non-governmental organizations have carried out the practice of varying degrees, and has laid a good foundation for the legislation, China is fully mature legal system in order to draw to develop perfect law, to promote the upgrading of government administrative capacity, to achieve the goal of the service-oriented government building.
|