|
In this paper, some of the world’s best table tennis players participated in 2007, a 2009 video contest statistics, will serve wheel wheel and then serve a comparative analysis of advantages and disadvantages hours of driving round and round in the technology portfolio return of serve, line combinations, placement of portfolio summarized the characteristics of the pros and cons minutes, trying to find pros and cons of table tennis in the sub-features.In this paper, literature and data, video observation, mathematical statistics part of the world’s best table tennis players a total of 30 games for statistical analysis, reached the following conclusions:1. A tee-round score was higher than the return of serve-round scoring rate, the rate of scoring rate by the statistical test (P<0.05), the overall technical and tactical use of the former was better than the overall technical and tactical use of the latter effect. Driving tactics, and the rate of return of serve tactics scoring rate by statistical tests (P<0.05), the former using the latter was better than the use of effects; one, three boards tactics and 2,4 boards and tactics scoring rate by the statistical ratio test (P<0.05), the former using the latter was better than the use of effects; one, three, five boards tactical and two, four, six boards and tactics scoring rate by the statistical ratio test (P> 0.05), both the use of effective no significant difference; serve Round stand-off tactics, and return of serve-round stand-off tactics of the rate of scoring rate by the statistical test (P> 0.05), both the use of no significant difference in results.2. serving round scoring rate serve tactical "one, three boards and tactics" stand-off tactics of "one, three, five boards and tactics. Return of serve round, scoring the rate of return of serve tactics "two, four boards and tactics" two, four, six boards and tactics "stand-off tactics. 3 ball tactics, the Fat Middle opponent scores the highest rate of placement of the use of nearly best tennis; return of serve tactics, the control technology scoring rate "technical scores of attack rate, the rate of scoring rate by the statistical test (P> 0.05), Both the use of effects no significant difference; return of serve on the placement of controlled technology to control the introduction of the highest scores.4. a, three boards and tactical, hair grab tactics scoring rate and utilization rates were higher than the fat-control tactics, and scoring rate by the statistical ratio test (P> 0.05), both use the results there was no significant difference in hair grab technology portfolio scores the highest rate of the net after having made nearly pull the line scoring the highest rate of backhand backhand grab; in two, four boards and tactical, scoring the highest rate of utilization and is charged with looting tactics, and technology portfolio in order to twist sideways short convergence scoring the highestrate of attack, scoring rate, and double-track line usage is higher than single, do not put the ball impact point on the convergence rate is higher than control scores grab link grab introduced.5. one, three, five boards and tactical, active tactics scoring rate and utilization rates were higher than the passive tactics, scoring rate by statistical test (P<0.05), the former using the latter was better than the use of effects. Fat continuous looting of the scoring rate and utilization rate of the highest technology portfolio in order to backhand grab a continuous scoring rate and utilization, double-track line scored higher than single scoring rate, impact point on the issue of Taiwan, scoring the highest rate of continuous looting. In two, four, six boards and tactical, four, six board technology in general scoring rate of convergence "strong convergence" passive interface, the line score on the single-line rate is higher than the rate of double-track scores. 6. tactical stalemate, scoring the highest rate of active locked in a stalemate. Take the initiative to use the stalemate line, press left Taiwan the highest score; general stalemate in Taiwan to mobilize the highest scores; passive stand-off in the mobilization of scoring the highest rate of all of Taiwan.
|