|
August 20, 2007, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange announced \permits individuals can legally invest overseas. However, less than three months, the \During this period, many scholars have proposed their own academic views, some scholars support the \The financial system does not yet have an open condition, the introduction of the policy may bring greater financial risk, B shares may be a repeat of the storm, stuck with domestic investors funds consequences. The purpose of this research is through learning and academic point of view of these scholars, from various angles, analysis of the reasons for the suspension of the \conclusions comprehensive answer to the \Research methods, I analyze the \method obtained the mainland stock market is imperfect, immature and do not have the mainland stock market short selling mechanism and other trading mechanisms different with the conclusion of the Hong Kong stock market standards, as well as the Hong Kong stock market, mainland investors face certain investment Conclusions of the risk. In addition, the use of evidence to the contrary of the analysis method, assuming the policy launched in the current, you may cause more hot money into the territory, stuck with the negative results of the domestic investors funds, which proved deeper \suspend the correctness of the policy. Then, in order to illustrate the \before and after the two sections, the use of measurement tools, compared to the Hong Kong stock market, the Shanghai stock market, the Hong Kong stock market and Shenzhen stock market before and after the split share structure reform changes, and draw the conclusion of the linkage between the two stock markets strengthened, that the continued trend of integration of the two stock markets enhancement, which launched the policy of the \
|