|
New railway projects , the line into hub scheme comparison evaluation is a very important decision . In this paper, the study of the relevant literature in the field , found that the routes were added to the hub program comparison evaluation is relatively small and there are some flaws , such as the evaluation index system is imperfect , evaluation methods for qualitative analysis . Order to fully construct evaluation index system, the introduction of a hub case study on the existing design document has been approved by the Ministry of Railways line , including four railway hub , 34 recommended programs and analysis of its superior than the alternatives , disadvantage , reached the 23 indicators factors . Attributed to these factors the key factor , the second key factor and non-critical factors into three categories, and the degree of importance of the three factors were assigned , and then the weight formula obtained each influencing factor in the program important than the election process the specific values ??for indicators important analysis provides a quantitative basis . In this paper, the applicability and advantages and disadvantages of some commonly used evaluation methods , fuzzy analytic hierarchy process line has good applicability comparison evaluation of the introduction of the hub program . Integration of previously analyzed the impact of factors , building evaluation index system, and to determine the factors Ci of the six -level indicators and 23 secondary indicators Sort Hierarchy factor c . The right value . Then , the establishment of the comment set V = VK = ( V1 , V2, V3 , V4 , V5 ) = ( excellent , good , fair, poor , very poor) , while establishing reviews from the factors set C to set V fuzzy relation matrix R , further define the primary and secondary fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach to filter out the recommended program through the final composite score . Finally, this paper \By technical and economic comparison of five specific programs , build tables and rigorous program evaluation , objective calculation , draw comprehensive evaluation score of five programs were 53.52,48.58,64.16,52.78.54.24 , select the highest score program I - 3 is the recommended program . Evaluation model is reasonable by an example , the evaluation system and evaluation methods in line with the policy ideas and requirements , has a certain practical value .
|