Dissertation > Excellent graduate degree dissertation topics show

The Judge System in a Comparatively Research of Chinese and American

Author: ZhaoWeiKang
Tutor: LiuXiHai
School: North China University of
Course: Legal Theory
Keywords: Sino - US judge system Compare System reform
CLC: D916.2
Type: Master's thesis
Year: 2007
Downloads: 515
Quote: 1
Read: Download Dissertation

Abstract


The judicial system is the basic content and the core of a country's laws. As the operation of the foundation of the legal system, the judge is a core part of the judicial system. Applicable law, in fact, is the rational thought process activities through their own thinking and rational judgment, the law is correctly applied to the cases, judges use legal knowledge to solve social conflicts. Therefore, the judges of the high-quality security laws and run correctly. To this end, various countries and regions attach great importance to the construction of the system of judges to ensure fairness, justice and order, freedom and legal value to be realized. System from the United States, two countries with different judges compared to to explore the regularity content of the judge system between the two countries as well as the future trends of to reconstructing our judges institutional deepening judicial reform, will have an important reference. This paper is divided into six parts. The first part summarized overview of the development of the introduction judge system, including the history of the history of the development of the Western system of judges and judge system. This is one of the deep-seated reasons Judicial System and the U.S. judge system has a very different, and we need a good visit. The second part of the third part introduces the current judge system in China and the United States. Judge system in China and the United States due to historical, economic foundation, the rule of law tradition is very different, through these two chapters we can see the differences in where. Whether we can learn from this difference to some things in order to make up for our deficiencies. Part IV, we want a detailed comparison of the characteristics and causes of the Sino-US judge system. This is the focus of this article, only by comparison, we can see the lack of our system, the direction and the way to find improved. The fifth part of the in-depth analysis of the bilateral judge system theoretical basis the judge system between the two countries to form the root causes of the differences. The theoretical basis for the construction of each system has its adapting judge system in China and the United States have such a big different, what is the theoretical basis of their institution building, which is in the reform of the Judicial System we need more in-depth analysis of the place. The sixth part of the direction of the reform of the Judicial System. Different analysis of the Sino-US judge system, we have a system of judges of the Sino-US had a rough idea, we can see the advantages and disadvantages of the Judicial System from the United States, we can judge system absorb their strengths to improve our deficiencies. So that our system will get progress. Our laws in order to establish a higher authority. This is the ultimate goal of writing the Sino-US judge system to compare: that is, to find from this comparison we lack clear direction of reform.

Related Dissertations

  1. The Comparison and the Consideration about the Difference in Curriculum Standards Content in Statistics and Probability between China & England,G633.6
  2. Study on the Operation Status of Pharmacy Trusteeship in Nanjing,R95
  3. The Comparative Study on the Reading Materials in the Current Textbooks for Shanghai and Hongkong High School Students,G633.3
  4. Application and Significance of CISS Classification and TOAST Subtype on Ischemic Stroke (Attach 210 Cases Analysis),R743.3
  5. Ancient Greece and Qin Aesthetic Ideas,B83-09
  6. A Comparative Study of Sino-US Civil,D771.2
  7. China and the United States Men's Basketball Men's Basketball A comparative study,G841
  8. Countermeasures of China 's urban housing system reform,F293.3
  9. Research on the Financial Rules of Public Institutions,F810.6
  10. A Comparative Study on Images of Xiao Hong and Zhang Ailing’s Novels,I207.42
  11. Predicament of Chinese Inquiry System in Social Transition and Development Studies,D632.8
  12. China 's border management system,D631.46
  13. The Comparison Study on Plausible Reasoning of the Course Objectives,G633.6
  14. The Comparative Study for Mathematical Professional Qualification of Junior High School Students between China and Japan,G633.6
  15. Sun Yat-sen and Mao Zedong’s Constitutional Thoughts Comparative Study,D693.0;A841.6
  16. A Compared Study on Contradiction Conception of Mao Zedong and Overdetermination of Althusser,B565.59
  17. Chinese and Laotian voice Comparative Study,H411
  18. The Law of Thinking household registration system reform,D631.42
  19. On the reform of job-related crimes arrest,D925.2
  20. \,K29
  21. Seventh Hunan University Games for the top eight men's triple jump athlete training and technical comparative analysis of the situation,G823.4

CLC: > Political, legal > Legal > UNIVERSITY > Justice system > The court
© 2012 www.DissertationTopic.Net  Mobile