|
Purpose: 1, according to the project implementation process and the effect of establishing a set of conditions for the implementation of the project evaluation system. 2, in the index system established on the basis of comprehensive evaluation model. 3, the use of comprehensive evaluation model of project implementation provinces empirical research, the continued implementation of the project and the final evaluation lay the foundation for the further improvement of the project to provide a scientific basis. Methods: In this study, document analysis, Delphi method, questionnaire theoretical research and empirical research will be combined from the organization and management, the implementation process, the effect of three dimensions to build the project evaluation index system, and on this basis, the use of composite score France to establish a comprehensive evaluation model, through telephone surveys, field research, the first pilot survey collected data sampled provinces, using composite score on the first batch of pilot models of eight provinces comprehensive evaluation empirical research. Using Epidata3.0 questionnaire data entry, SPSS16.0 questionnaire analysis. Results: 1 This study is based World Health Organization project evaluation framework established by the classic \Publicity four two indicators, the implementation process, including recruitment, hiring management 2 two indicators, the implementation effects include social benefits and satisfaction of two two indicators. There are three indicator system-level indicators, eight two targets, 18 three indicators, 16 four indicators. 2, two expert consultation to determine index system, experts actively coefficients were 95.5%, 100%, authoritative coefficient 0.831, the second round of expert opinions coordination coefficient an index of 0.687, 0.689 two indicators, three indicators 0.569, 0.688 four indicators. The third round of expert advice to determine the weight distribution, the research team leadership and project management decisions using a program three indicators, two indicators of use of the program two, three indicators use a program. Final weight distribution is: organization and management 0.2, project implementation 0.3, implementation results 0.5. 3, in accordance with empirical research data sampling results, the first batch of pilot provinces and better implementation of the project, the consolidated scores were 56.13,70.84,55.96 , 67.90,70.56,62.15,55.61,55.74, from good to bad in the order: the 2nd province, the 5th provinces, 4 provinces, the 6th province, the 1st provinces, 3 provinces, 8 provinces, the 7th provinces . Use good, bad cluster analysis, classified as good provinces are: 2, 4, 5; classified as moderate provinces on the 6th, classified as poor provinces are: 1, 3, 7 No. 8. The model results weighted TOPSIS method with a correlation coefficient of 0.929 (P lt; 0.001), with better consistency. Conclusion: This study practicing physician recruitment for rural hospitals to build the project, including project organization and management, project implementation, project results three one index comprehensive evaluation index system, including eight two targets, 18 three indicators, 16 a four indicators. The index system can fully reflect the implementation of the project provinces Projects Development, organizational management and project implementation results, can be used for township hospitals recruit physicians practicing comprehensive evaluation of the project. 2, the composite score was constructed using comprehensive evaluation model, the weighted TOPSIS method with the results of the evaluation model are in good agreement. Composite score based on results of the first batch of pilot provinces project implementation project from good to bad overall numbers are: 2, 5, 4, 6, 1, 3, 8, 7.
|