|
The executive administrative adjudication as a means of resolving civil disputes, with smooth social management, reduce costs and many other advantages to solve conflicts. According to traditional theory of power, only the court can exercise jurisdiction, but with a high degree of social and economic development and the division of labor, some jurisdictions began to exercise delegated to the executive. In China, the last a very long time administrative ruling system does not find theoretical support for judicial appointments, there is no specific legislative practice, a clear, reasonable regulations, making its development encountered many challenges. With health care, transportation, intellectual property, natural resources and other professional disputes continue to emerge, administrative rulings by more and more scholars to rethink. This paper aimed at the development of administrative rulings are problems, the use of theoretical explanation, empirical analysis, comparative analysis and other methods, theory and practice two aspects of this proposed legislative administrative decisions and measures to improve the path. Paper is divided into four parts, as follows: The first part describes the basic theoretical issues administrative rulings. First, the nature of its definition and analysis of different points of view, it is defined as an administrative judicial acts, not including administrative dispute settlement. Then use the power to appoint the theoretical analysis of administrative adjudication system rationality and legitimacy, and proposed three different types of awards. Finally, the legislation concerning administrative decisions to sort out and analyze the reasons for changes in legislation, and the ruling has come to function and role. The second part, combined with theoretical interpretation of current administrative rulings legislation. In principle, the main institutional settings, ruling the scope, procedures, remedies, supervision, grievance issues during the validity of the provisions of analysis, the existing problems. The third part introduces foreign-related system. First, the British tribunal's institutional setup, staff, referees procedures, evaluation oversight mechanisms are introduced and then points out the place for reference. Secondly, the parties introduce Japanese administrative proceedings for administrative adjudication proceedings against administrative effectiveness and resulting in resolving civil disputes which provide ideas contradictions. The fourth part, the improvement of administrative decisions made paths. On the principle of administrative adjudication provisions of legislation, institutional body set up, the award range, procedural requirements, monitoring mechanisms and administrative proceedings and judicial power to change the defendant constant improvement ideas put forward for reference reference.
|