|
From the late 1990s, community civic organizations flourished, but because China's current uniform for civil society organizations to implement dual management system, community civic organizations because small scale, weak in strength, reach registration standards, the government managed to become blind, self- Legitimacy is also facing challenges. Beginning in 2002, some local civil affairs departments introduced the policy, civil society organizations to explore the implementation of community filing system, mainly through lowering the threshold and specify the business unit in charge of the way the community is asked departments to apply for civil society organizations to the specified record. This paper documents, interviews and observation, collected Qingdao, Jinan, Xi'an, Nanjing, Wuhan, Hangzhou and other cities filing system implementation related materials, in comparison, induction, based on the analysis from the state - society perspective on the filing system to make a theoretical discussion, and proposed a reform of the management system CSOs Suggestions. For the government, through the filing system, the communities included in the regulatory scope of civil society organizations. First, the proposed filing system processes and implementation process led by the Government, civil society community is passive acceptance; Secondly, after the filing of civil society organizations by the District Civil Affairs Bureau, district offices and community committees, co-management, three management system management more than double strict; once again, the government through record-keeping system of the community made a further distinction between civil society organizations and screening, selective training can help the government control the grass-roots social community civic organizations. Civil society organizations and the community, through the filing of civil society organizations, in part by the government's support and input, but autonomy, the gradual loss of autonomy, and the other part, without the support of the Government, and no record of them together with civil society organizations, development is still facing great difficulties. Visible, explore the implementation of local government filing system, more out of supervision and management purposes, not for cultivation and development of community civic organizations. Community civil society organizations as an important part of civil society, can only develop under the control of the government. Filing system is not fundamentally broken dual management system, only one China in transition, transition and alternative measures, it is impossible to solve the current development of Chinese civil society organizations on various issues arising in the course, but with the dual management system will produce some contradictions and conflicts . To fundamentally solve this problem, you need to build the Chinese government and society interaction relationship, and it also requires a long time to achieve. For China's national conditions, combined with foreign non-governmental organization management experience, made a number of civil society organizations management system reform ideas and opinions, including: improving the legal environment, unified supervision, classification regulation, and promote cooperation between the Government and civil society organizations, the establishment of social regulatory mechanism.
|