|
In judicial practice, how to effectively consider public opinion, to avoid ignoring public opinion caused by the presence of touch with reality, eliminating judicial aloof, superior, apathy, avoid being swayed by public opinion of Justice, public opinion about the phenomenon in the political flinch, training people belief in the rule of law is that every man must face a legal matter. This paper attempts to the concept of public opinion, composition, influence on the trial, taking into consideration the necessity of public opinion, taking into consideration the principle of public opinion, consider the mechanism of public four aspects, the completion of trial practice in the pursuit of justice considerations and public opinion writing. This article begins with a detailed public opinion analysis, analytical point of view is divided into three, namely, the main expression of the wishes expressed opinion and expression of public opinion the way a platform. In addition, also on the public opinion from the perspective of whether the process of promoting the rule of law, whether rational point of view, whether the true expression of a classification perspective, and examines the impact of public opinion on the administration of justice, this effect into relevant historical survey and recent For decades we examine the state of public opinion in two ways. Study is to clarify these ideas of public opinion, public opinion can have a relatively clear understanding. The second part of this article is mainly about public opinion and impartial consideration of the relationship, from an academic who, in order to pursue justice itself should be excluded from the public, but specific to the status quo of China's trial, moderate consideration public opinion precisely to pursue to justice , taking into consideration public opinion and the pursuit of justice is a cause and effect relationship, or it can be said that the pursuit of justice is considered the guiding ideology of public opinion. Consider the public opinion is not on temporary condescend, but to really get to know the voice of the people, the administration of justice into the public, so that harmony and justice, the sun of justice. In judicial practice, it is necessary to consider public opinion, but also to the public shackling, so as to listen to public opinion, while the basic dignity of both uphold the law and maintain realistic sense of justice can not be done in isolation from society, not touch with society, not to be burdened with the public. According to the principle of considering public opinion in the face of public opinion stressed that judges, not swayed by public opinion, the public opinion into law within the scope of consideration in accordance with legal procedures. Strict principles of public scope, focusing only on considerations of public opinion cases Discretion larger case, which is France's stability and predictability requirements; maintain a high degree the principle of openness, is the sun of justice, administration of justice inevitable requirement; consider public opinion follow the principles of initiative, emphasizing the play of Justice's initiative to meet the public demand for justice. In the above four principles under the guidance of public opinion considered by seeking the road to eventually reach the working mechanism of public opinion considerations and the pursuit of justice. First, it should build public opinion formation mechanism, the formation mechanism of the premise that the public has adequate judicial tolerance, a necessary condition is the legal community and academics has enough support for justice. Secondly, the establishment of a variety of ways to consider public opinion, the existing multi-platform considerations of public opinion for the consideration of public opinion on the network, the network of public opinion has its own advantages, but there are a lot of defects, so you need to build a variety of platforms to consider public opinion, public opinion considerations method is divided into specific responses as well as a general response. Judicial system also includes consideration of public opinion into two categories, such as in the course of the trial, the importance of the jury system; contents of the judgment on strengthening the referee book reasoning, from the perspective of the referee to convince the parties.
|