|
Father rearing style refers to the day-to-day activities of the family, Fathers inchild-rearing and education, demonstrated by the relative stability of the treatment ofchildren’s behavior patterns and trends, and communicate at the same time father tochildren and thus express the emotional atmosphere of the collection,It is the father’scomprehensive embodiment of parenting attitudes, perceptions andbehaviour.Learning Burnout is due to too much pressure or lack of interest, andstudents are tired of negative attitudes and behaviors about learning.This study uses the father rearing style scales (amended in1993, Yue Dongmeimeasurement options singled out of EMBU in the father) and burnout scale for middleschool students (Hu Qiao, Dai Chunlin learning Burnout scale produced in2007), theparticipants were tested.Test results were made by some subtotals and mean, varianceand correlation analysis, combined with the history of research both at home andabroad for father rearing style and learning burnout on, draw the followingconclusions:1. High school student’s father rearing factors, emotional warmth is the highestscores, so the father of contemporary high school students for their children’seducation in favour of "emotional warmth".2.High school student’s father in child sex, whether only-child, and different gradesexists difference.Specific performance is: on the gender dimension, in addition to apreference for being girls scored higher on the test factors, the other factors showboys scoring higher;Whether only-child dimensions, undue interference and denialdenial factor, only children scored significantly higher than the non-only-child’sscore.Other factors in addition to the preference test factor cannot be compared, alsorevealed a tendency towards non-only child of score is higher.But the difference isnot significant;On the dimensions of different grades, severe penalties, denial ofdenial and on overly protective factor,the highest score in grade1, followed by thegrade3, then the grade2, grade2students scored significantly lower than the other twogrades.On the emotional warmth and understanding, disproportionate interference factor difference is not significant.3, overall levels of learning Burnout of high school students is the middle-lowerlevel, But to each dimension, the situation is different.Students have the highestaverage score on the depletion of the physical exhaustion, at least above the scalemore than0.5point.Secondly, the scale shows that students ’ low-efficiency senseis generally not very high.4, high school students of different grades in physical exhaustion and burnout overallon grade level in the dimension of the existence of significant differences.The lowestis the grade2, followed by the grade1, the most senior is the grade3students.Thereare significant differences on the factor of alienation between teachers and students,arranged order from lowest to highest is: grade1, grade2, grade3, which is far morealienated than the other grade students.On the gender dimension, in addition to theboys physical exhaustion factor slightly below girls, the others is higher than girls inall factors, including the overall level of burnout,The difference of the emotionalexhaustion, low-efficiency sense and the overall level of burnout is reachedsignificant proportions.5, Besides the preference test factor, most of the father rearing factors aresignificantly related with the most of learning Burnout factors includes totalscores.Emotional warmth factor with the most of learning Burnout factors includestotal scores is a significant negative correlation; there is a significant positivecorrelation between severe penalty factor, excessive interference factor and refused todeny with emotional exhaustion,teacher-student alienation, the physical exhaustionfactors and learning score; Between excessive depletion of protective factor,emotional exhaustion factor, alienated teachers-students factor and learning Burnoutfactor exist the significant positive correlation.
|