|
2002 electric power system reform , China's power industry has begun the process of privatization , mainly implemented in the form of privatization of state-owned enterprise restructuring and private access to electricity markets and foreign real privatization . Nine years later , the effect of electricity reform unsatisfactory . Electricity monopoly , high tariffs , electricity high profits and other phenomena still exist. Privatization of public services is always accompanied with legalization , the government Legislation , government regulation of innovation is its main line. Privatization does not mean the government from the public service sector completely disappeared, just perform their duties on behalf of the government to change the way public services provided directly from the previously transformed into public service providers effective supervision. Indeed electricity privatization , government regulation is more important. Regulatory authorities require public service market access to public services , quality assurance , supply stability, universal service , price and other aspects of supervision, to ensure the welfare of public services to achieve market functioning and effective balance between government regulation . In this paper, the practice of China's power privatization , especially in recent years after the privatization of China's power generation industry in the status quo. Learn from common law countries such as Taiwan, electricity privatization and the more comprehensive legislative and institutional options to the basic theory of electricity privatization , electricity regulatory body , electricity regulatory measures , electricity regulatory procedures, electricity regulation and other administrative regulations relief system perspective to analyze , hoping to raise electricity privatization on Chinese legal regulation be helpful suggestions. This thesis includes the following four sections. The first part of this section is the basic theory . First, for the privatization of the content, method , legitimacy and rationality of the basic issues to be confessed . Secondly launched a special narrative electricity privatization introduced electricity privatization cause, manner and Britain, the United States, France and other countries electricity privatization basic mode. Finally respectively electricity privatization necessity of legal regulation , electricity privatization principles of legal regulation , electricity privatization means of legal regulation of exposition. The second part , the part that the existing laws regulating electricity privatization Analysis . First, the existing legislation on electricity privatization to sort out legal norms , in accordance with laws , administrative regulations, departmental rules and regulations , the State Council and relevant departments of the State Council, the order of normative documents empirical statistics . Second, from the legal hold , legal norms perspective on current electricity privatization legislation is reviewed , pointing out deficiencies. The third part , the part of the privatization of electricity regulation practice situation discussed. First review of China 's electric power system rheology . Second, the State Electricity Regulatory Commission ( hereinafter: SERC ) of the \Finally, relying on electricity privatization operating status , noting that the existing regulation in the electricity privatization regulatory body , regulatory and procedural means missing . The fourth part of this section presents comprehensive legal regulation of electricity privatization several recommendations that the legal path for electricity privatization . Mainly from the electricity privatization laws and regulations system improvement , power generation, and the independence of regulatory body constraints , electricity privatization regulatory measures , regulatory procedures , regulatory relief and other aspects .
|