|
Objective: To investigate hemorrhoids individualized surgical treatment options, and to observe the clinical efficacy and benefits of the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids butterfly-shaped \Methods: This randomized controlled study, Guang An Men Hospital treated 60 patients diagnosed in March 2010 -2011 in April for the butterfly-shaped mixed hemorrhoid patients, using a random number table, were randomized into treatment group and control group of the 30 cases, two groups of gender, age, duration of disease, hemorrhoids number of preoperative main psychosis generally Statistically, the difference was not statistically significance (P gt; 0.05), comparable. The fixation of the two groups of patients with treatment group Λ-shaped flap free control group using traditional external dissection and internal ligation. Compare postoperative pain, bleeding, edema, urinary retention, anal stenosis and other complications and sequelae ratings and patient satisfaction ratings, were compared between the two groups of hemorrhoids come off after time, wound healing time, hospital stay, and recovery of normal working hours. Experimental results through the SPSS16.0 data analysis system, count data are used the X2 measurement data using t test, mean t-test between the two groups. Results: The average hemorrhoids off time (6.20 ± 1.126) days in the control group hemorrhoids average shedding time (6.97 ± 1.066) days, two groups hemorrhoids average shedding time comparison, a significant difference (P lt; 0.05); treatment group average wound healing time (5.30 ± 0.702) days, the control group, the average wound healing time (23.40 ± 2.966) days, The mean wound healing time compared with the treatment group was significantly better than the control group; treatment group, the average return to normal working hours (30.30 ± 7.875 treatment group than the control group) in the control group, the average return to normal working hours (46.67 ± 11.012); postoperative complications: postoperative pain, the comparison of the first day after surgery pain scores, a significant difference ( P lt; 0.05); Comparison of the third postoperative day, there is a significant difference (P lt; 0.05); postoperative seventh day comparison, there was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); postoperative day edema Points of comparison, a significant difference (P lt; 0.05); Comparison of the third postoperative day, there is a significant difference (P lt; 0.05); postoperative seventh day comparison, no significant differences (P gt; 0.05 ); the first day of the two groups of patients with postoperative bleeding integral comparison, there is a significant difference (P lt; 0.05); comparing the third postoperative day, there is a significant difference (P lt; 0.05); postoperative seventh day comparison no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); comparing two groups of patients satisfaction, there is a significant difference (P lt; 0.05). Postoperative urinary retention situations, anal stenosis compared with no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); hospital stay of two groups of patients, no significant differences (P gt; 0.05); showed total efficiency comparison The total effective rate of 96.67%, the control group, the total effective rate was 100%, by the statistical analysis, P = 0.806, no significant differences (P gt; 0.05). Time is earlier than the treatment group wound healing hemorrhoids off time, the treatment group was significantly shortened wound healing time, can effectively reduce postoperative pain, edema, bleeding and other complications, reduce patient pain, patient satisfaction is high. Conclusion: the \
|