|
Jury system originated in ancient Greece, Athens, Solon founded Jury Court nobles broke the monopoly of the judiciary, strengthen civilian power. Incarnation as democracy and freedom of trial by jury began its journey. Jury Court ancient Greece and Rome, to the common law system and the civil jury trial system parameters, and then to China's people's jury system, the jury system has undergone a long process of development, during which there are twists and turns brilliant there are also critically praised. Development of the jury system in different countries destiny, let us begin the judicial system of this world have made outstanding contributions to the system produces anxiety. The same is the embodiment of democracy, a beacon of freedom, why it can shine in some countries, while in other countries, the development of land is unsatisfactory? Was not a \the problem can be solved? If so, how to take; If not, how do? was to give up, or stick? such questions have been plaguing us. China's people's jury system is similar to the civil law assessor system, although after decades of development, but still in an immature stage, exists in the predicament. In recent years, as China's judicial system to speed up the process, the jury system once again focused people's attention. Can be said that China's current jury system either at the legislative level, or at the practical level, there are deficiencies. Although the May 1, 2005 start of the \But also failed to address the root causes problems in the jury system, the system is still criticized. Does the jury system is destined to be \Fai? jury system we try to survive on the soil, the existing legal provisions and the people's jury system in depth the actual operating conditions and detailed analysis, to find the answers. In this paper, research on the jury system as the core, compared to other countries in the world to survive the jury system environment and development, combined with China's current legal provisions jury system as well as its people's courts at the grassroots level of the actual operation of the jury system for comprehensive and detailed research, fight for our jury system reform and improve their contribution to a force. Paper is divided into three parts. The first part is a national jury system overview. Mainly from the national development process of the jury system, living soil, status, and other aspects of the system evaluation comparative study between China and some other countries, the jury system, try to summarize our jury system, the jury system with other countries on the similarities and differences in the living environment. The second part, we combine the relevant provisions of law, the jury system at the grassroots people's courts operating conditions were analyzed carefully. Based primarily on the last three months to get the 201 questionnaires collected in the research process as well as literature, etc., from the people intuitively jurors empaneled assessor case in the trial of the performance and impact of the rights of people's jurors , obligations and responsibilities of the actual operation of the jury system, \to provide strong support. The third part is the way out of the jury system. Combining the first two parts of the discussion and analysis to find the answer to the question - Is there a fit of the jury system, \
|