Dissertation > Excellent graduate degree dissertation topics show
Reflections About Illegal Evidence Exclusion Procedures
Author: DengShan
Tutor: YeQing
School: East China University of Political Science
Course: Legal
Keywords: Illegal evidence Exclude Program Burden of Proof Legal consequences
CLC: D925.2
Type: Master's thesis
Year: 2011
Downloads: 288
Quote: 0
Read: Download Dissertation
Abstract
|
Accompanied by the acceleration of the process of the rule of law in China, the extent of the litigation civilization continue to improve, \To this end, our laws also continued with the introduction of the illegal evidence exclusion provisions, such as Section 43 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 61 of the Supreme Court \, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, People's Procuratorate of the Rules of Criminal Procedure 365. But is limited to the provisions of principle, there is no specific operating procedures, difficult to play an effective role in the judicial practice. July 1, 2010, jointly issued by the Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of National Security, the Ministry of Justice, \Provisions on Several Issues \These two provisions to fill our blank criminal illegal evidence exclusion rules applicable procedures, is of great significance. But look, we can not fail to see that the two provisions still exist Illegal Evidence Exclusion program design is too rough, provisions overly principles, subject to further refine and improve. In this paper, the contents of the two provisions, Brief Analysis on China's illegal rules of evidence, and to put forward their own views of their deficiencies. The article first defined the concept of illegal evidence, divided into the \That for the former, it should be absolutely excluded, and the latter should allow the prosecution correcting. Second a comparative study of the scope of the illegal evidence, the scope of the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence the two provisions set to make the appropriate assessment, propose a general standard should be required for evidence of illegal words to exclude addition to torture and the threat of violence the two means other than illegal way to obtain evidence of illegal words. The third part of this article on illegal evidence to exclude the application of the proposed main proposed time, the burden of proof, the legal consequences of a comparative study. Finally, a critical analysis of the provisions of two pieces of evidence that should be refined to exclude evidence of illegal words provisions to further refine the description of torture and to prevent the use of illegal evidence means. The same time improve the system for the protection of the accused, witnesses, and able to play its due role in the illegal evidence exclusion rules. Illegal evidence exclusion rule is the inevitable result of modern human society, respect for human rights, the protection of human rights, and the pursuit of the development of the concept of procedural justice. Two evidentiary provisions in the program to provide a legal basis for the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence few years will stay on the books of theoretical knowledge into workable legal requirements. Although the two provisions is not perfect, but I believe on this basis, through academic, judicial practice departments, as well as other community efforts, China's illegal evidence exclusion program is bound to be perfect, and eventually formed a line with China's national conditions the illegal evidence exclusion rules.
|
Related Dissertations
- Research on the Allocation System of "No Legal Basis" Burden of Proof in Unjust Enrichment,D913
- A Research on the Claim Rights for Lessee’s Accessio Interests,D923
- China’s Criminal Suspect’s Rights Protection Institutions in Investgation Procedure,D925.2
- On the Distribution of Burden of Proof of the Illicit Money in Corruption Cases,D925.2
- Large amounts of property from unidentified sources Exploration,D924.392
- Difficult Problem of Agency by Estoppel,D923.6
- Breakthrough in Dilemmas of Medical Tort Lawsuit,D925.1
- On Torture and its containment,D925.2
- Burden of Proof in the Application of Unjust Enrichment Proceedings,D925
- Study on the Start-up Procedure of Forensic Identification for Mental Disorder,D919.3
- Analysis of the Country Illegally from the Rules of Criminal Evidence of the Present Situation and Build,D925.2
- Analysis of the Tax Burden of Proof in Administrative Proceedings,D925.3
- Analysis of Judges’ Logic and Approaches to Distribute the Burden of Proof and Examine Evidence in Civil and Commercial Cases,D926.2
- A Case Study of the couple's joint debt problems,D923.9
- Research Rules Illegal Evidence Exclusion problem,D925.2
- The Procuratorial Organ to Carry Out Illegal Evidence Exclusion Rules of Obstacles and Problem Research,D925.2
- On the criminal proceedings the allocation of the burden of proof,D925.2
- Application of the Exclusion Rules of Illegal Evidence in Criminal Cases,D925.2
- Study Onapplication of Proof Standard in Criminal Case,D925.2
- Trade Secret Infringement Litigation Allocation of the Burden of Proof,D923
- Studies on Medical Injury Compensation System in the Background of "Tort Liability Law",D923
CLC: > Political, legal > Legal > Chinese law > Procedural Law > Code of Criminal Procedure
© 2012 www.DissertationTopic.Net Mobile
|