|
As the theory of Traditional Civil law, Herrschaftsrechte is a kind of independent right system, which forms the civil rights system with other three rights, including right of claim, right of formation, right of pleadings, this view is questionable. The emergence and development of concept of Herrschaftsrechte has a close relationship with the emergence and development of the concept of property rights. With the turn of 18,19 century private law system movement and Kant’s "motivation" emergence, the concept of property rights including the Relation of people and property as a "motivation relations of domination " is highlighted, the concept of Herrschaftsrechte is created, and becomes an independent right, widely covering the right of credit, property right, intangible property rights, family right and inheritance right. Just a few decades later, the Herrschaftsrechte is acceptable by States that do not need to quote a description of the concept. Chinese scholars define the concept of Herrschaftsrechte is almost similar. Herrschaftsrechte is the direct dominance and the rights to exclude others from interference, the obligators are not specific, without others involving to exercise the rights. Property rights, intellectual property rights, personal rights are Herrschaftsrechte. In accordance with the Herrschaftsrechte of these characteristics, right of credit is Herrschaftsrechte, and property rights, intellectual property does not meet the concept of Herrschaftsrechte. It can be said that any right is not Herrschaftsrechte, on the other hand, every right is Herrschaftsrechte. Herrschaftsrechte is unscientific and it is meaningless. Herrschaftsrechte is not independent rights system, there are some flaws in Traditional civil rights, the civil rights system of rights consist of right of claim and remedies.
|