|
Objective: To investigate the umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy feasibility and application prospects. Methods: Retrospective analysis since July 2009 in our department has implemented 88 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with clinical data , in which 60 traditional porous routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, LC), 28 routine after umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, TUSPLC), TUSPLC group, 24 cases completed by conventional laparoscopic instruments , four cases with special porous channel casing and flexible laparoscopic instruments is complete. Compare their incision length , blood loss, operative time , postoperative complications, ambulation time, postoperative feeding time , the frequency of use analgesics , wound fat liquefaction and postoperative hospital stay . Results: There was no case of conversion to open surgery , no postoperative complications. In blood loss, operative time, frequency of use analgesics , postoperative complications, wound fat liquefaction , etc. , TUSPLC with the LC group showed no significant difference between (P gt; 0.05); while the incision length , postoperative hospitalization time aspect TUSPLC group than LC group, the difference was statistically significant (P lt; 0,05). Conclusion: The umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective treatment of benign gallbladder disease , compared with the LC is more invasive , better cosmetic results , faster recovery , the use of porous road casing and flexible laparoscopic instruments can reduce the difficulty of operation has clinical value .
|