|
"NEET group" is not a phenomenon unique to China, it has a distinct global features, but as a transformation of our society and social structure change during the process of emerging new products, it has a strong Chinese characteristics. "NEET groups" appearance, not only the impact of the traditional Chinese family ethics, returned to the family and society pressure and burden. With the "NEET group" has expanded each year, "bite the old" has been from a family phenomenon has become a social problem, and have had some negative effects, such as to be the social stability and a potential threat to social harmony, establish a negative example, affect the heritage and carrying forward the traditional virtues, to be the waste of resources and the loss of the national economy, etc. As the family and school environment, lack of education so that "NEET groups" outlook on life and values of deviations, increasingly fierce social competition increases "NEET groups" life stress, the dilution weakened traditional values "NEET groups" moral force, and "NEET groups" own the problems that exist, are difficult in a short time out of their "gnawing old" dilemma."NEET group" is the result of a variety of reasons, So to solve this problem requires the family, school, community and government agencies multilateral cooperation. Ideological and political education by improving family environment, school environment and social environment, not only can solve is a fact of "NEET groups" thinking and conceptual issues, but also from the roots to play the role of precautionary measures. The ideological and political education and improve employment conditions, job opportunities, and improve security system solution, "Neets" practical difficulties in combining the initiatives can achieve a multiplier effect. Channels to increase the publicity of the socialist concept of honor and traditional virtues of education, advocacy efforts, and guide young people into a correct concept of socialist morality. Learn from foreign experience of similar groups in education, innovation and our ideological and political education.
|