|
At present, the development of social sciences in China is entering a comprehensive, multi-level, inter-disciplinary, inter-departmental theoretical innovation, the new stage of method and system innovation. How scientific, objective and impartial evaluation of social scientific research results, establish and perfect the mechanism of China's social scientific outcome evaluations, the evaluation criteria and evaluation system, and has become an urgent need to solve the major theoretical and practical issues. No proper scientific evaluation, there is no scientific management, there is no effective disciplines competitive enhance feasibility planning, there will be no disciplinary research goals. This article Zhaobi point, by the analysis of the current evaluation system of China's Achievements in Social Science, to explore which resulted in many problems in the main, objective reasons; through the contrast and learn from the advanced experience of foreign or social science evaluation, the final proposed improvements countermeasures and recommendations of the evaluation system of social science. The salient features of this paper are: first, to systematically analyze existing research results, the article summarizes the definition of social scientific achievements, form and characteristics of social science outcome evaluations, methods, and the difference between Social Science outcome evaluations of the evaluation of the results is different from the Natural Science; Second, the article of social science outcome evaluations are not standardized attributed to three: not standardized evaluation and the evaluation criteria, the not standardized evaluation procedures and the evaluation process is not standardized; first traced through the analysis of the phenomenon, the article that China's Achievements in Social Science Evaluation generated because evaluators failed to deal with the results of innovation and theoretical interpretation of academic value and social value, short-term value and long-term value, direct value and indirect value, the outcome of the quantity and quality of the achievements, domestic recognition and abroad agree that the relationship of these six areas; Fourth, the article introduction and analysis of a relatively mature or social science evaluation system by the developed countries, summarizes the current worth We draw on the useful experience. Finally, suggestions for improvement of social science evaluation system proposed countermeasures suggestions: first to rebuild the evaluation criteria established criterion of truth, the standard of value, aesthetic standards in social science evaluation process historical unity; Second, we must improve the evaluation method, specific measures include: an established citation analysis; adhere to the peer review; establishment of three new achievements investigation system; establish four specialized institutions or social science evaluation; the five emphasis on off-site assessment; six great importance to the objection.
|