|
Value of the death penalty controversy has 200 years of history in the West, mainly the retention or abolition of the death penalty in China, limiting the application of the death penalty or to expand the death penalty applies to both manifestations are different, but the essence is the same, the based on the value of the death penalty question. To this end, I explore from the theory of evolution, theory, practice, and other aspects of the analysis of the value of the death penalty and the death penalty in China's development trend and reality. This problem the author discusses six sections: an overview of the first chapter of the death penalty in this chapter based on the historical development of the death penalty, discusses the death penalty from the law of development of the death penalty to the overall development trend. In addition, through the analysis of the pros and cons of the death penalty itself, to question the value of the death penalty. Chapter II of the value of the death penalty and the penalty is just, humane and effective is the rational basis of the penalty value of the value of the death penalty should be carried out according to the angle from the penalty value rational. Therefore, the author's analysis of the value of the death penalty from the impartiality, humanitarian and effectiveness of the three aspects to analyze whether a penalty value rational according to analysis based on the presence of the death penalty has. Death penalty because of severe punishment, applies to intentional homicide, endangering national security, endanger public safety, military and other serious intentional crimes, in line with the crime and the equivalence principle, and thus has the impartiality; However, because of the two death penalty to deprive people life for the contents of the right to life of the people and the people the absolute right to basic human rights, the death penalty is not a humanitarian; death penalty has a crime prevention function, and therefore has the effect, but also because of its protected legal interests than they deprive interest, thus in line with the penalty favorable, which basically meet the efficiency requirements of the penalty. In short, although the death penalty with impartiality and effectiveness, but against humanity, sexual, therefore, on the Ought, the death penalty should not as a penalty. The third chapter of the death penalty in the fate of our country because the death penalty against humanity, essentially Therefore, all countries in the world have questioned the value of the death penalty abolition and restriction of the death penalty, and then in the legislative and judicial practice. Can not remain indifferent in the face of the wave, but based on the current national conditions of our country, the author of three aspects of China's economic, political and cultural background to analyze, and thus concluded that, because China does not yet have the abolition of the death penalty, economic, political and cultural background, advocate, at this stage in our country, our country still can not abolish the death penalty, but should continue to retain the death penalty. I believe that the criminal policy of the fourth chapter of the death penalty and criminal policy is the premise to repeal or restrict the death penalty, Therefore, I advocate that our country should be timely transformation of China's criminal policy, that is, from the narrow criminal policy to a broad criminal policy shift from the traditional criminal policy to modern criminal policy change, so reserved, but to limit the death penalty becomes a corollary of the death penalty in criminal policy. Chapter death penalty in China's current situation as well as the legislative and judicial improve the national conditions of our country based on the present stage, to retain the death penalty, although it also has made some efforts to limit the death penalty, but still unsatisfactory, therefore, the author according to China's criminal legislation judicial defects, proposed legislative and judicial means, so that our criminal
|