Dissertation > Excellent graduate degree dissertation topics show
Of Confirmation Principle of the Logic Substantial Evidence Doctrine Experience
Author: MaoYongJun
Tutor: LiuZuoHuan
School: Jilin University
Course: Philosophy of Science and Technology
Keywords: Confirm Dogmatism Skepticism Metaphysics Dialectics
CLC: N031
Type: Master's thesis
Year: 2005
Downloads: 297
Quote: 0
Read: Download Dissertation
Abstract
|
Every things has“the beginning”and “the end”. Process that was forgot easily is the matter that often have, but its start with the end is always the deep impression. The truth is easy, in the existence experience of time, the paragraph and rhythms must show the start and the end of the process. So-called start, which points a matter that need not ascend to accept another matter, but cause another matter occurrence naturally,So-called terminator, which is to say that one matter accepts some matter but have no another matter at afterward." start" with" eventually" of the cause and effect relation, is the eternity guide of mankind reasonableness. So, can we depend the cause and effect relation actually? " start" with" eventually "that the mankind called actually existence? This became the eternity topic of philosophy then .The sun rises and downfalls, the sea water rises and the tide to fall the tide, the life bears to die, new king substitute old end ……in experience world of the rise and fall means the new beginning; The new beginning must be taken off the end. Circulating back and forth, living not death,However whether the origin of the world also is thus or not, whether it has the essence or not behind the phenomenon? This topic that would be philosophers thinking, they always dispute, it has no end. Although it experienced to undergo the dogmatism, skepticism , change direction epistemology and linguistics,also still such,Confirm principle is the outcome of the time, Auguste Comte affirmed that theprinciple is the basic principle of the whole science researches, it has already made the natural science acquire the huge success, so we have the reason to believe that its would make the social science research benefit. Confirm also must be true, useful, and have the characteristic of the affirmation, precision for a kind of philosophy theories. As a result it opposes the vain and useless of the old metaphysics, the old metaphysics just predicate the thing generally, so it should be abandoned. Auguste Comte thought persistently that what we think that depends on the whole condition of ourselves, no matter what it is inside or outside, it will relate to the study of our substantial evidence inevitably, the whole scientific knowledge must build up in coming from the factual foundation of observation and experience experiences, the experience is unique source and foundations of the knowledge. The whole scientific knowledge must limit in the scope in the experience phenomenon. What science discuss is just in the experience phenomenon scope; Otherwise, understanding didn’t probably, the knowledge loses its basis, the discussion is unmeaningful. Ludwig Wittgenstein thought that the language is a form to say the experience factual, as a result the form of the language says and must limit at the experience scope inside. Which is inside the experience scope can be said, and it is meaningful, the people can hear understand; But it can’t be said outside the experience scope, and be unmeaningful, the people do not understand, as a result remain mum to them The experience confirmation the principle thought of the logic substantial evidence doctrine comes from the Ludwig Wittgenstein Then it is the Auguste Comte’s linguistics substantial evidence doctrine principle. This principle of a little bit main is that the knowledge is depend on experience and proposition’s meaning depend on whether it says the experience contents, namely whether the ability was confirm by the experience or the certificate is false. Only proposition that can be confirmed by experience or cannot is just meaningful, otherwise it is nonsense. Certainly, the experience confirmation is just a possibility confirm inprinciple, and, for some question, only passing the direct confirmation to the indirect confirmation that be attained. For the logic empiric," confirmation principle that can be confirmed " not only is " empirical confirmation "but also is" the confirmation of the logic". In their eyes, the latter is more important than the former .Because we can imagine that it can not be confirmed in any experience ;But if it can not be confirmed in logic, then it is contradict, as a result it is can’t imagine at all." by the analysis of the logic sentence construction, we can clear up the emergence of a word in science question, whether the contact and the order of sequences between phrase and phrase match" the form rule" or not .If matched, ignoring its contents whether the reflection is physically, it is true, or it is false, this is" the confirmation of the logic ".The purpose of" the logic truth" is to make the experience knowledge logical and concise ,it must be clear and systematized. Since the separation of the idea world and the essence world, the experience parties has already headed for the road of the doubt theory, and to the essence world they adopt that can’t be talked, but Immanuel Kant then puts forward the separation of the body and the idea world definitely, let the thing from the faith of the body replaces the thing from body understanding, the traditional philosophy headed for the end apparently. So Auguste Comte wants to replace the metaphysics with the research of the substantial evidence to build up mankind’s ordered society. it Is to say, his mindset is the Immanuel Kant experience world, but for the essence world, then adopt the attitude of doubt the theory. The philosophy headed for the experience direction exaggerative absolute. We can say, Auguste Comtc substantial evidence doctrine is the mixed body of Immanuel Kant and experience parties doubt theory philosophy. Butlost Immanuel Kant’s introspect attitude, more exaggerated to the experience phenomenon direction absolute. The new substantial evidence doctrine use the mathematics logic to analyzes and order, and exactly this at biggest degree up urge the people to be called it the logic substantial evidence doctrine or logic empiricisms; At the same time the analysis of the terminology speech replaced the analysis of the old certificate doctrine felling, the experience thought; finally philosophy became the analytical clearness activity of the language, but the metaphysics became the nonsense question substantially. The analytical method of make use of the logic and languages to built up philosophy theory is the huge contribution of the logic substantial evidence doctrine to the philosophy, but, we say it exaggerates the experience direction absolutely, so they will have endless difficulty. They can’t distinguish the observational question with the analytic question strictly, the physics doctrine will agree on alignment doctrine at all, the inductive method still could not guide the absolute truth, the cause and effect relate is invalid, the past repetition does not represent hereafter also will repeat. The substantial evidence doctrine faces such numerous difficulties, actually it is because of the method of the metaphysics which can not catch the dialectical sport of the confidence world in the concept thinking, thus they only deny the body world, and think that the experience world is really the solid, and again equal the truth to science because thinking of inertial. They did not know that there are have no essence world, we will not know the reality of the experience world, and what the truth match? Therefore, we think if we want to outside the fan’s turn of the logic substantial evidence doctrine, we must promise the metaphysics of a certain form, here only is the problem how we are to choose. We need to resolve two problems, one it is that we must promise" the body
|
Related Dissertations
- Theoretical study of U.S. patent confirmation of v. litigation.,DD915.2
- The Research of the Problem of Culture Construction Establishing by Chinese Modern Intellectuals Through "The Debate between Science and Metaphysics",D663.5
- Researches on Contradiction from the Point of Logical Paradoxes,B812
- Analysis of Contract Fraud Crime,D924.3
- Analysis of derivative financial instruments related to accounting issues,F233
- Administrative proceedings confirmed the judgment of the illegal,D925.3
- Township party electoral reform,D262.2
- Study on Application of Derivative Financial Instruments in China,F832.5
- Research on Popper’s Anti Inductive Theory,B561
- Research on Suit of Confirmation,D925.1
- Accounting for land use rights of,F275
- Invalid contract confirmation and the statute of limitations,D923.6
- The Research on Environmental Liability Accounting System and Information Disclosure,F235
- A Study on the Confirmation of Equity Investment Financial Assets,F233
- Confirmation and Measurement of Environmental Costs abut Unexpected Environmental Events,X196
- Recognition and measurement of environmental cost improvement and application of,F275
- Research on the Relationship between the "Popularity" and "Enhancement" of Volleyball,G842
- Research on the Improvement of Accounting Reports Based on Human Capital Perspective,F231.5
- China 's investment in real estate guidelines,F293.3
- Primary Exploration on Environmental Costs of Coal Enterprises,F406.72
- Research on Share-based Incentive Accounting Problems,F275
CLC: > SCIENCE AND > Natural scientific theory and methodology > Scientific methodology > Dialectics of Nature
© 2012 www.DissertationTopic.Net Mobile
|