|
Pu Dong Taiwanese ethnic slogans are beefy central language branch, is an endangered language, to determine their status line is, both scientific value, but also practical significance. In this paper, the use of historical linguistics theories and methods to explore the Cape banners and other beefy central language affinities: first introduces general slogans, and then with other beefy central language compared with the beefy central slogans Chapu test various affinities between languages finalize its beefy language branch of the Department of Central genus position. This article lists the general slogans and beefy central Zhu language voice correspondence between the observed situation corresponding affinities compared morphological and grammatical features, the statistical rate of the core level of the word homology to finalize the status of general slogans Embryology . Cape banners and other beefy central initials correspond neater female voice. P slogan labial p, ph, b, m, laterals l, (?), Apical t, d, s, Velar k, kh, g and later parts of consonant q, qh, h, (?) with the beefy central languages ??correspond to each other; Overall, the general slogan initials and Lackey, Masao, Raha, Bach's corresponding ratio Gelo language more closely corresponds to some, but coda with cloth center, Raha correspondence better than with Lackey, Gelo correspondence. Judging from the voice characteristics, general slogans not only retains the nose, stuffed Endings, there are long and short vowels of the opposition, and therefore the central cloth closest language and Lahad language, with Lackey and Gelo vary greatly; speaking from the grammatical structure , general slogans and other languages ??have the same beefy central word formation, and consistent with their word order, and did not show and what language closer. In the nearly three hundred core words, the S \u0026 P Bach cognates with the highest proportion of 49%; proportion with Lackey, followed by 47%; and ranks the lowest proportion of all Gelo language, but also up to 36% ; these types of language and universal banners proportion of cognates at 35% -50%. Six language word homologous points are 75, accounting for 25% of total; three languages ??homologous 183 points or more, accounting for 62%; two homologous percentage points more than one language should be above 80%. This further demonstrates the universal banners and other languages ??genesis beefy central relationship; article from the proportion of cognates, voice corresponding situation, many other aspects peculiar words proved S \u0026 P and beefy central Baja is the language most closely related two languages ??(dialects), Lackey language should be included in S \u0026 P, which a central distribution system.
|