|
In the process of economic development of China's modernization, growing urban scale needs to occupy more land, continue to build economic and technological development zones, University City is frequently occupied by a few acres of land, a large amount of arable land into construction land or that the public land will become inevitable. But China's rural land is collectively owned, to change the use, for a first collective into the state, and then through the transfer of land use rights of countries to enter the market, and that there must be a middle and only an intermediary - the government, therefore expropriation arable land from peasants during the single party is concerned, it is not the market price obtained, but the government gave compensation price. Since it is not trading at market prices, there is no market mechanisms work, then how to determine the compensation price has become an important and difficult problem satisfactorily resolved. Precisely because of this, not only the land compensation issue has become a hot social issues, in academia also caused extensive discussion. More scholars put perspective on the land requisition compensation standards to determine, but this opinion, to improve the land requisition compensation system must be involved in all the land compensation aspects of improvements, including land compensation procedures, methods, scope, criteria and Then the distribution of compensation payments, payment and so on. This paper will discuss the details of these issues, and to solve the problems inherent in the existing land requisition compensation mechanism put forward vision. First, the main contents The first part of this article discusses the concept of land requisition compensation system, the basic content and land requisition compensation system associated with some of the theories. To demonstrate the importance of improving land requisition compensation system, focuses on the theoretical basis of land compensation, including the following: (1) make up the history of scissors debts. Due to the agricultural workers make up scissors policy reasons, resulting in the current economic development of urban and rural residents 'income and the huge gap, if imposed, farmers' land, it must compensate for this gap. (2) From the point of view of ownership and property rights awareness. Speaking from the right system, farmers have a right of collective ownership of land, while the collective views of land tenure, land ownership should be most of the revenue goes to the farmer. (3) State the right to requisition the land market should be a national rather than state control over land ownership rights deprivation. Due to public land and land administration has the mandatory levy is not only limited to levy, levy levy how much and when and where, but not in the compensation is also used to force. Solely on the national land as a national way of obtaining property, the property transactions should follow the general principles, the implementation of equivalent exchange, give farmers a fair compensation. (4) the obligation to bear the main functions of public land should be national, rather than landless peasants. The exercise of public functions of the state is the subject of civil and social organizations are national obligations of the subject, but in the form of civic national obligations and pathways are statutory obligations and is subject to all citizens and not just farmers, groups of farmers is not a single public land The main obligations, there is no reason to allow the farmers to bear the costs for the public land for construction, land acquisition, at least when it should allow farmers to obtain the same land and commercial land compensation price that the public should be lower than commercial land compensation for land acquisition compensation is contrary to the principle of compensation value. And to the theory of land requisition compensation system-level barriers to expansion and concepts discussed, considered specific for each stage of land acquisition compensation system is perfect just done under the existing institutional framework tinkering, and the most important thing is to clearly define land ownership and the concept of governance and the role of government changes, the government should be to build a service-oriented government for the direction of economic construction managers, focusing on social justice, equal national treatment to farmers, and strive to build a harmonious socialist society. The following sections were all aspects of land acquisition compensation system requirements for specific discussion and propose appropriate policy envisaged, including land compensation procedures, the scope of land requisition compensation, land compensation standards, the allocation of land compensation and payment follow-up questions. To build a sound and rational land requisition compensation system over every aspect, every problem is very important, only improve every aspect, to solve every problem, so that farmers can get the satisfaction of land compensation. Specifically: (1) currently not enough land compensation procedural fairness, impartiality, openness, landless farmers lack of voice in this process rights of landless peasants is unfairly treated or that is unfairly treated, thereby breeding range contradictions and problems affecting rural social stability. Must pay attention to this question, you must be a reasonable solution. And its most fundamental solution is to reduce the local government areas in the discretion of land to expand the farmer's right to information, participation and the right to relief. (2) In the land compensation, the government encouraged a variety of ways to take proper placement of landless peasants, in order to ensure long-term livelihood of landless peasants, but I think how much compensation or specific content is not important, important is that these methods must meet two condition: respect the wishes of farmers; placement in various ways, these methods should not be more than mere general welfare monetary compensation is low. (3) The current scope includes land compensation and land directly related losses, while China's land to the peasants lies not in the land itself, there are many other features, such as employment, social security, the significance of these features are not for farmers lower than the value of the land or ground attachments. Even in foreign countries, not just the land compensation for direct losses. Therefore, China's land requisition compensation may be appropriate to expand the scope. (4) of land requisition compensation standards on the road towards the rationalization constantly moving, but there are still many problems. The main issue of land compensation standards reflected in the low compensation standards, compensation standard is unreasonable. Specific features: current land management law provides only for land compensation fees and resettlement fees shall not exceed three years prior to requisition of the land is 30 times the average annual output value of the cap, but does not require \limit, which led to the practical implementation of local governments often lower, not higher; compensation price to three years before the original land use as the basis for calculating the average value does not meet the current market conditions and economic principles; compensation price does not include the potential for farmers compensation for loss of, damage to the interests of farmers recessive. (5) the distribution of land compensation, release and subsequent use of the problem is also very important to rationalize the allocation of compensation primarily in the institutional, policy formulation level, should not be a large part of the land acquisition compensation fee allocated to a \- collective economic organizations should be more explicitly allocated to farmers; while its release in addition to a reasonable dissemination channels also continued effective supervision, can not be deducted layers depleted finally to farmers, the farmers have no place can redress; follow-up questions mainly refers to the rural collective economic organizations assigned land compensation fees, also stands to reason that this part of the proceeds should be used collective farmers body, but in reality often becomes all officials for non-compliance channels jeopardize the interests of farmers. Although these issues are not the main part of the land compensation, it is also effective relationships with farmers can really get a satisfactory land compensation must be reasonable solutions. Second, the thesis view a land requisition compensation system should improve specific aspects of every one perfect, every step can be neglected, must be taken seriously. Compensation standards even higher, if not reach the hands of farmers, but also to no avail, but is fueling corruption, leading to tensions between cadres. 2. Whether it is done at the expense of farmers from the past, and now farmers deserve rewards of ownership, or from the future to protect the lives of farmers and stability arrangements to be made in terms of fair and reasonable compensation to farmers are supposed to. From the Central Government and rural development, building a harmonious society in terms of policy direction, but should not be rapid development in the city, the rapid urbanization process again depriving the interests of farmers, thus resulting in new social contradictions. 3 of land requisition compensation system is also improving, but there are still many unsatisfactory areas. From the perspective of the development of the whole society, the lack of a fair and equitable treatment to all the main ideas and advancing consciousness. Especially the narrow scope and low compensation compensation. In actual operation, but also because of the government and the farmers always unequal status, coupled with the supervision is not in place, the implementation of policies will be disfigured, open and fair compensation for land acquisition program is not enough to compensate for the arbitrary standard, compensation is difficult to successfully distributed to farmers. 4 for the improvement of land acquisition compensation system is very important, but is always a temporary solution, the most important thing is that the Government must change the concept of governance, and more to public managers or public service role emerging as the main body to create a fair society fair competitive environment and continue to improve the socialist market economic system. Third, the main contribution of a paper. Compensation system for land acquisition from theory to practice in all aspects of a more systematic and comprehensive exposition, recognizing the improvement of land acquisition compensation system needs to improve every aspect of concrete, each link can be neglected. Whether the system design or supervision should be noted that, while one can not ignore the other heavy. Such as the issuance of land compensation and follow-up questions are currently no enough attention, but it is a very important issue, whether it is directly related to the farmers to get compensation levy local commitment. 2 This paper believes that improving land acquisition compensation system is an important prerequisite is that the Government has a role in line with the rules of the market economy orientation, the building service-oriented government and building a harmonious society implement policy objectives, in dealing with the issue of land compensation to farmers equality national treatment. Otherwise, any debate, proposals can only become empty talk, and can not really reflected in the land requisition compensation institutionally more difficult to implement in practice.
|