|
In the current calls for reform of the Judiciary, a view that the current judicial system tends to \The so-called judicial \and the unification of Justice, the judicial power given by the State becomes the place tools improper benefits a social phenomenon. Judicial \in order to fundamentally solve this problem. This paper argues that the issue of miscarriage of justice by the judicial corruption the judge low caused by a variety of factors, the judicial \subvert reform, therefore, the current judicial system is not the most cost-effective manner. The same time, even if the system of administration of justice \the risk of the local judicial supervision and regulation, it will increase corruption in the judiciary, to bring more miscarriages of justice. On the other hand, from a sociological point of view, the \Moreover, in the process of \Judging from the experience of developed countries, their judicial and places closer together, but it does not appear that we are worried about, \This shows that the judicial \For this reason, it is recommended by the appropriate increase in the treatment of judges, to promote open justice, improve the quality of administrative decision-making, and measures to strengthen the supervision of the administrative act, the effective promotion of justice. At the same time, this article suggests in the study of law, in addition to the necessary \shaping and constraints, in order to avoid differences in \This article is a superficial attempt.
|