Dissertation > Excellent graduate degree dissertation topics show

Discussion on Reasoning Restriction of Judicial Discretion in Defamation Cases

Author: DuanWenXin
Tutor: MaMingXian
School: Lanzhou University
Course: Legal
Keywords: judicial discretion defamation legal reasoning fact identification restrictive approaches
CLC: D926.2
Type: Master's thesis
Year: 2011
Downloads: 47
Quote: 0
Read: Download Dissertation

Abstract


In judicial practices, judges cannot refer to the correspondent provisions in the case trails for the imperfect and hysteretic current legal system, which requires the judges make the comprehensive discretionary judgment according to the spirit of legislation, the social expectation to justice and the personal experience in case trails. However, the discretion is embedded with to much private will. If performed improperly, it may trigger disputes. This study is based on the case analysis of defamation of Naxi ancient music, which happened in Li Jiang city, Yun Nan Province in 2004. This case offers a typical example to analyze how the judges perform judicial discretion reasonably and properly when dealing with the cases of this kind. In defamation cases, judges have more freedom to practice the discretion relevantly because there are many indefinite factors like the definitions, measuring scales and public attitudes which call for the judicial discretion. On the other hand, the current relevant legal system is not so perfect and humanic that judges cannot judge according to the definite legal provisions.This thesis makes a detailed analysis to the specific legal provisions and relevant legal interpretation of defamation case trails. By comparing the application of judges to this case, the conditions of judges to perform discretion will be defined. Secondly, judges should give the enforcing reasons for making every discretionary judgment. Thirdly, there are many indeterminate factors in current legal system to identify the fact of defamation, this author of this thesis will analyze if it is reasonable for the discretion in performing the fact identification. Last but not least, based on the analysis of this case, the study concludes the judicial approaches to restrict the discretion of judges and puts forward some suggestions.

Related Dissertations

  1. News legal remedies against defamation,D923
  2. Judges judicial activism grassroots space,D926.2
  3. Discusses the Judge on Justice Judgement Power of the Civil Evidence,D926.2
  4. On Active Judiciary: Reconstruct the Rural Justice Conception in a Multi-Interests Context,D926
  5. A Discuss on Standardization of Sentencing,D926
  6. The Discretion of the Judge,D916.2
  7. Criminal defamation network analysis,D924.3
  8. Definition and civil defamation defenses,D920.4
  9. Speech Acts Theory in the form of legal reasoning Reconstruction,D90-051
  10. Legal Reasoning and Legal Interpretation,D90
  11. The Influence of Legal Rules and Moral Evaluation on Legal Reasoning,D90-05
  12. Judicial Practice of Public Order and Good Morals,D913
  13. On the \,D924.3
  14. The Theory and Methods of Criminal Law Interpretation,D924
  15. Communication from the Perspective of Research on the Mass Media Defamation,D923
  16. Analysis of legal reasoning analogy,D90-051
  17. On Legal Logic in China and It’s Developing Directions,D90-051
  18. The Format Criterion of Master Degree Thesis of SWUPL,D90-051
  19. Research on the legal logic of New Thought,D90-051
  20. Logical analysis of legal reasoning and Construction,D90-051
  21. Legal reasoning in the use of the judge referee,D90-051

CLC: > Political, legal > Legal > Chinese law > Justice system > The court
© 2012 www.DissertationTopic.Net  Mobile