|
Objective : To observe the electro-acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training on patients with shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke upper limb motor function , pain and edema , shoulder and metacarpophalangeal joint mobility, activities of daily living explore the effect of electro-acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training on the brain shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke treatment. Methods: shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke 92 patients were randomly divided into EA group 30 cases , 31 cases recovered , electro acupuncture combined with rehabilitation group 31 cases . Three treatment groups were six times a week , were treated for 4 weeks for a course of treatment. Electro-acupuncture group were given acupuncture treatment once a rehabilitation group were given rehabilitation training time , electro-acupuncture combined with rehabilitation group were given acupuncture and rehabilitation training each time. Before treatment and after treatment for a clinically relevant functional evaluation : upper limb motor function was assessed using simplified Fugl-Meyer score (FMA), upper extremity pain , edema was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), shoulder joint protractor activity measured using , metacarpophalangeal joint activity with the palm of your hand with the thumb tip distance score, ADL ADL using the modified Barthel index (MBI), and statistical processing and analysis ; course of shoulder-hand syndrome after the end of each period of comprehensive efficacy assessment comparison of efficacy . Results : EA group therapy combined with rehabilitation after stroke shoulder-hand syndrome, the total effective rate was 93.55% , electro-acupuncture group, the total effective rate was 83.33% , rehabilitation group, the total effective rate was 67.74% . The total effective rate in the treatment , the comparison of the efficacy and improve upper limb motor function , pain, swelling degree , shoulder , metacarpophalangeal joint activity , the electro-acupuncture combined with rehabilitation group were better than the EA group and rehabilitation group , there was significant difference (P <0.01) and a significant difference (P <0.05). In shoulder pain , swelling of hands to improve aspects of the EA is better than rehabilitation group (P <0.01). Improvement of activities of daily living , the three groups showed no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: EA with rehabilitation training after stroke shoulder-hand syndrome has obvious pain , swelling, improve joint mobility function, can relieve cramps , improve upper limb motor function, increased shoulder , metacarpophalangeal joint activity to promote functional recovery after stroke . Its treatment of post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome , better than EA and simple rehabilitation therapy.
|