|
Objective: To understand diabetes treatment Urumqi Uighur community health education intervention, to explore ways to improve the status of diabetes treatment, diabetes prevention for the future work of the community in Xinjiang accumulation of information. Methods: a specialty hospital in Urumqi Uighur diabetes 80, were randomly divided into the principles of intervention and control group (internal control), select both homogeneous who have not had health education in 40 patients outside of the control group. Intervention group patients according to individual differences combine various forms of health education control group without intervention, were observed for 12 consecutive months. And at the time of enrollment into the group after the first 12 months were used for patients with diabetes-related knowledge, lifestyle and diabetes knowledge questionnaire evaluation of diabetes self-management level; SF-36 Quality of Life Scale, Social Support Scale, Family Functioning Scale evaluation of quality of life, social support and family functioning condition; required by Chinese Diabetes Prevention Guide from glucose, blood pressure, blood lipids, weight four aspects of evaluation in patients with type 2 diabetes diabetes control situation. Diabetes costs from the total amount of drugs, inspection fees, health care costs four aspects of evaluation. Results: ① The baseline survey results: three groups of diabetic patients general condition, diabetes awareness, lifestyle changes, diet, exercise conditions, quality of life score, score of social support, family functioning score, physical examination, blood test results, costs associated with diabetes aspects of TCM symptoms and no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); ② self controlled results after the intervention: control group (within the control group and the external control group) in patients with diabetes mellitus after intervention awareness, lifestyle changes, diet, movement, quality of life score, score of social support, family functioning scores, diabetes-related costs situation TCM symptoms of diabetes, the physiological and biochemical test results were not significantly different than before the intervention (P gt; 0.05). Intervention group patients with diabetes awareness, lifestyle changes, diet, exercise significantly improved the situation than before the intervention (P lt; 0.05); quality of life score, score of social support, family functioning score was significantly improved compared with before the intervention (P lt; 0.05) ; care costs decreased significantly compared with before the intervention, inspection fees than before the intervention to improve (P lt; 0.05); TCM symptoms significantly improved compared with before the intervention (P lt; 0.05); BMI, SBP, fasting glucose, 2h postprandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, urine protein and TC significantly decreased compared with before the intervention (P lt; 0.05), WHR, DBP, TG, HDL-C and LDL-C compared to pre-intervention was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); ③ after the intervention group The results were: control group (within the control group and the external control group) in patients with diabetes mellitus after intervention awareness, lifestyle changes, diet, exercise conditions, quality of life score, score of social support, family functioning scores, diabetes-related costs situation, diabetes TCM symptoms, the physical examination, blood test results showed no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Intervention group diabetes awareness, lifestyle changes, diet, exercise conditions compared with the control group (within the control group and the external control group) significantly improved (P lt; 0.05); quality of life score, family function score was significantly higher than that (within control group and the external control group) (P lt; 0.05); social support scores subjective support, support utilization, support Total score than the control group (within the control group and the external control group) significantly increased (P lt; 0.05), objective support score than the control group (within the control group and the external control group) had no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); health care costs than the control group (within the control group and the external control group) (P lt; 0.05), inspection fees higher (within the control group and the external control group) (P lt; 0.05); improve diabetes TCM symptoms significantly better than the control group (within the control group and the external control group) (P lt; 0.05); BMI, fasting glucose, 2h postprandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, TC compared with the control group (within the control group and the external control group) significantly decreased (P lt; 0.05), SBP, DBP, WHR, urine protein, TG, HDL-C and LDL -C compared with the control group (within the control group and the external control group) had no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); Conclusion: Uighur community health education measures on the treatment of patients with diabetes have promoted through health education interventions can improve diabetes diabetes knowledge, self-management level and improve the patient's blood sugar levels, diabetics can change the composition ratio of diabetes-related costs, inspection fees increase, decrease health care costs. The prevention of diabetes and its chronic complications and development, improve the quality of life is important.
|