|
Franz Kafka, Austrian novelist of the 20th century. He often used the fables of the writing style, the works are often very profound meaning to express his cynical determination and courage. Kafka special measures to make the twentieth century writing genre have ratified pioneer. British poet Joyce Oates think he is completely on par with Dante, Shakespeare and Goethe legendary heroes and saints style characters. Kafka is also considered to be the first person to create a modernist literature precedent, has a special impact on the latter part of the symbolism, absurdist, stream of consciousness, black humor, super-realism, and many other schools of modern art. \Bizarre, allegorical writing techniques, describes a land surveyor K do everything possible to leave no stone unturned trying to enter this symbol of power and noble castle, presents to the reader a mysterious, ambiguous image of the castle. Qian Zhongshu is a famous Chinese scholar, modern literary analysts, writers, literary historian, classical literature researcher. In Chinese literature as \\As we all know, the siege is such a classic dialogue: Shen Ming: \, away from the knot, not the Bureau. \Fang later life everything has feelings. \A pedigree Kafka of modern Western literature, the other is as modern Chinese literary scholar Qian Zhongshu. Two different nationalities, the times are different, different backgrounds of life, but by their works reflected the ideas are striking similarities. Kafka's \\Two works written in two different contexts of Western, through a profound description of the inner world of the hero \The tragedy of life is affected. In addition, two works in other areas also have many similarities and differences. For example, in the style of writing, they have taken humorous and ironic approach, the perception of life expressed profound meaning; Theoretically, Kafka's original modernist expressionism and Qian Zhongshu writing style there are many similarities ; impact, the two works have played a far-reaching impact of the times role. Therefore, this thesis decided Qian Zhongshu's \Introduction to this thesis, body, and conclusion of three parts. The main contents are as follows: The first part is an introduction. The introduction describes the writing background of the two works, the writing style of the two writers and two works in the research status, and finally the value and practical significance of this thesis. The second part is the body part. Consists of three chapters. The first chapter is the theoretical part on the work of the two writers writing. Mainly through the expressionism of Franz Kafka writing style and Qian modernist writing style to elaborate. Expressionism thinking, more twists and turns reflects the drawbacks of the capitalist society, the absurd human alienation as a specific historical conditions of human society inevitable phenomenon, giving the work a strong nihilism and pessimism mood; arts, good at using the grotesque and symbolic expression, especially expressive approach to the performance of abstract thoughts and feelings. Modernist focus accurately reflect contemporary life, strong objectivity. It advocates objectively and calmly observe the real life to be precise and delicate description, in accordance with the original style of life, and strive to faithfully reproduce the typical characters in typical environment. Secondly, from a theoretical point of existential analysis of the two writers. Finally, the theory of Schopenhauer and Kierkegaard's tragic to see two works. The second chapter focuses on the subject of \more should be seen as an anti-pursuit, the pursuit of escape, escape the traditional burden of education, love, career and marriage, there is the attitude of a helpless spirit of resistance and cunning game of life. \Fang K are ongoing efforts to struggle, struggle, which is the common humanity of the East and West. To analyze the similarities and differences of the two \Then, from the point of view of the \\Through the analysis of some of the details in Fang siege experience on behalf of senior intellectuals, as well as being affected by Chinese and Western cultures affects both the rootlessness performance by Qian Zhongshu unique, witty, ironic way, against the background of their inner loneliness and pain. \For most people, the castle symbol of superior bureaucracy, articles It is through the description of the absurd behavior of \Chapter two works by \\own senior intellectuals strong desire to \Kafka's \Kafka, in addition to the to write common human tragedy, with particular emphasis on writing his unfortunate race, write the homeless, wandering the Jewish nation. In short, the two works from all levels have led to different levels of thinking of the people in all stages of life are inspirational, forming a huge impact and to promote the development of the times. The third part is the conclusion. In this section, pointed out that the papers from the different levels of analysis of the characteristics of the writing of \Two writers living in the Western context, but the two works from the creation theory, the theme of the novel, the use of writing skills, as well as shown by the national feelings have a very similar place. Through the analysis and discussion, it is possible to give readers a more thorough understanding of two classic works, and be seen in the social life in the West, the pursuit of all levels of the different.
|