|
\Notes of power due to Wang Su, has spread. The tide of doubt about history, \Continue to come out of the unearthed documents, the \But today, the \Unearthed documents only prove that Wang Su pseudograph the \And academia \In this context, the \\Select \The same time, \Vice versa. In addition, in recent years, the so-called \What is the reality, but also need to re-study. This paper selected two books related materials verbatim than exploration, the multifaceted study the relationship between the two words, reading, discourse structure. Through comparative analysis, it is found that the relationship between the two following situations exists: the same source material \chapter (citing Chapter 5);, \, Chapter 2 (list 1); two books each change, the pros and cons of each, a total of eight chapters (listed); six out of different material systems, 6 (List 3); 7 , \In contrast, we found that \And \Such as the more uncommon the words plain; ideological content, originally for the social background of the ideological content of the pre-Qin changed to conform to the Han Dynasty, the unified social reality content of raw materials; discourse structure, split , Chapter, demolition to separate two chapters. This shows that the \Visible, the traditional \
|