|
As a part of this thesis, the study of language behavior patterns , based on the capture and analysis of Ming China and Japan to apologize overall situation in language behavior , through the results of the two college students by gender questionnaires were conducted econometric analysis , describing its use in case, the characteristic behavior patterns , according to the basis of interpersonal apology laws , such as the choice of language behavior on the two countries committed to apologize to clarify the similarities and differences of language behavior patterns . And tried to social, cultural reasons and intentions of people , values , habits , etc. constitute the difference between the two countries to inspect and research. Therefore, this study can not only improve the cultural differences between China and Japan , for Japanese and Chinese teaching teaching development and progress can also play a positive role. A Comparative Study of Chinese and Japanese , or between countries , he apologized , though everywhere, but more research on the behavior of the Chinese and Japanese languages of apology , especially comprehensive study also rare. Thus, the behavior of the Japanese language apology contrast as a research subject, both profound significance , is imperative. In addition , during the foreign language teaching, especially when cultural differences , misunderstandings and friction due to the language and culture of different countries has become a major cause of the problem . Therefore, this study also responsible to provide evidence and information to solve such kind of problem important mission , conducted in Japanese comparison is very valuable. This thesis consists of the following parts: The first chapter ( Prologue ) , first to clarify the purpose and significance of the study and research on the basis of the date of first overview on several important terms used in this paper to be involved in explanations and instructions. Next on the research methods of investigation , the investigation summary , the survey area and object , setting the scene to investigate after a few aspects of the simple instructions. The second chapter , about daily life in China and Japan to apologize performance , first from a macro point of view were analyzed. Through analysis, the behavior of the Chinese and Japanese languages apology apology ratio of apology strategies and the use of idioms , despite similarities, but more differences exist . For example , in the face of \For the \And utilization of the top three in the use of apology strategies , the Japanese use more \In addition, the Chinese people with complex way of apology apology , but the Japanese have focused on single use \In terms of the performance aspects of the usual apology for the \However , only from the macro analysis can only apologize to grasp the overall situation of bilateral language behavior , but can not be seen up and down the profound things , affinity relationships specifically affect apologize if the behavior of the two countries . In view of this, I followed it through to the questionnaire were analyzed and a number of research projects , the issue was supplemented . Chapter III , on a range of issues surrounding the performance of an apology , an apology from the performance of the various items and usage ( thanks and apology alternately , \rate ) , China apologized to the Japanese people 's sense of violation and performance , and other aspects are described. Made some conclusions line results. For example, in terms of thanks and apology alternate Japanese men and women alike , in gratitude to apologize when using the expression ratios are higher than the Chinese people . And in Japanese society , men use more grateful expression, while the ratio of women to express apology is higher than men . Compared to this , in Chinese society , both men and women tend to use thanks to expression. Chapter IV ( the last chapter ) , common ground and differences between China and Japan to apologize about the linguistic behavior summarize and referred to the inadequacies of the present study , the need to reflect on the place and future research.
|