Dissertation > Excellent graduate degree dissertation topics show

The Comparison of Sino-Russian Weaponry Naming

Author: QinKai
Tutor: WangLiZhong
School: Harbin Institute of Technology
Course: Foreign Linguistics and Applied Linguistics
Keywords: weaponry naming methods comparative analysis
CLC: H35
Type: Master's thesis
Year: 2013
Downloads: 14
Quote: 0
Read: Download Dissertation

Abstract


As two military powers, both China and Russia have very strong national defense forces, and their weaponry is quite advanced. Besides, the namings of both countries’weaponry are different and unique-each has its own characteristics. The comparison of the weaponry naming between the two countries can not only strengthen understanding of military knowledge, but also deepen the understanding of the significance, the reflected cultural characteristics and ethnic differences. Additionally, it can also increase the interoperability of the two languages and summarize the translation of weaponry names, which provides a theoretical basis for the mutual translation of Sino-Russian weaponry, and greatly improves the efficiency and accuracy of translation, making the translation closer to the idiomatic expressions so as to promote military exchanges and cooperation between the two countries.There are nine primary categories of Sino-Russian weaponry naming, including naming after characters, animals, geographic vocabularies, natural phenomena, military vocabularies, plants, tribes and ethnic groups, design bureaus, manufacturers, and revolutionary vocabularies. The first five are major categories, however naming weaponry after plants, design bureaus, and manufacturers are unique to Russia, while revolutionary vocabularies are specific to China. Comparatively speaking, Russia’s naming of weaponry is richer, and the used terms are strongly evocative; whereas China’s is rather monotonous, but more regular.Through the comparative analysis of Sino-Russian weaponry naming, we can see the naming of weaponry is not randomly created, but obtained on the basis of the weaponry principles, the functions and features, as well as the shapes and modes of operation. The naming of Sino-Russian weaponry has profound psychological foundation and content, which can reflect the emotions of shock and awe, praying for wins, worship, and love. It also has language features such as vividness, subtlety, cleverness, profoundness, and convenience. Furthermore, the naming of Sino-Russian weaponry reflects their ethnic, religious and regional differences.

Related Dissertations

  1. Lake Sediment Accumulation Areas of Yunnan Altiplano Ecological Conditions of Phosphorus and Nitrogen Interactions,X131.2
  2. Wuhan Entrepreneurial Effect of Policy Implementation to Promote Employment Index System,F249.27
  3. KCS: A Case Study of Expert Teacher, Experienced Teacher and Novice Teacher in a High School,G635.1
  4. The 16th Asian Men's Basketball Championship team Comparative Study Technical Usage,G841
  5. Korean Students ' Acquisition of Chinese Classifiers error analysis,H195
  6. Chinese people of Korean language learners adverb preposition Error Analysis,H55
  7. Comparative Study of Cold Front Type and Mongolia Cyclone Type Sandstorm Process,P445.4
  8. Comparative Analysis of Features of Math’s Paper of UEE,G633.6
  9. The Research on "Content Form" Distribution and Combination of High School Chemistry Curriculum Standard Textbook (Elective Books),G633.8
  10. Research Countermeasures and Problems on Rural Passenger Safety of Chenzhou City,F542
  11. Conveyance of Artistic Conception in the Ancient Chinese Poetry Translation,H315.9
  12. Comparative Research on Play "Romance of Three Kingdoms" And "Three Kingdoms",J905
  13. Comparison of the Cloud Liquid Water Path in Arctic Using Satellite Date and Ground-based Microwave Radiometer Data,P407
  14. The Comparative Study of Liaoning Province with the International Major Areas Regional Logistics System,F259.2
  15. Research on the Global Sensitivity Analysis Method of Air Defense Missiles Weapon System-of-systems Combat Effectiveness,TJ761.13
  16. Evaluation of Teaching Management Optimization,G473
  17. Urban Community Management Model,C916
  18. Study of the Army-civilian Incorporate Logistics Support for Hi-Tech Weapon Equipment,F426.48
  19. Nanning and Chengdu City Community Air Volleyball carry Comparative Analysis,G842
  20. Design and Implementation of the weapons and equipment information management system,TP311.52
  21. The Research of Unequal Distribution of Income and Strategies in the Transition Period,F124.7

CLC: > Language, writing > FOREIGN > Russian
© 2012 www.DissertationTopic.Net  Mobile