|
Objective: To study the mental health practitioners stages Prison Police, analyze the impact of mental health factors, is targeted to maintain the mental health of the prison police, the prison police team to raise the overall quality of the scientific basis. Methods: A self general scale, symptom checklist, the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, Coping Style Scale, Self-Esteem Scale and self-acceptance scale, using cluster sampling method unified survey of 350 prison police all the data input spss13.0 conduct comparative analysis and correlation analysis mean. Results: 1, the prison police somatization psychosis factor score was significantly higher than the national norm (respectively: 1.45 ± 0.59,1.36 ± 0.56, P <0.05), interpersonal sensitivity factor score was significantly lower than the national norm (1.48 ± 0.60, P <0.01). Prison Police detection rate of 9.75% moderate psychological problems, the different practitioners stages detection rate, respectively, as follows: 8.69%, 12% and 8.72%, the detection of specific psychological problems among the three groups differences. 2 the different practitioners stages Prison Police in perceived stress score, self-acceptance, there are significant differences in self-esteem factor practitioner for more than 10 years of prison police perceived stress score was significantly higher than the the practitioners time of 4-10 years (23.54 ± 6.15,21.49 ± 8.39,23.81 ± 6.36, F = 3.509, P <0.05); practitioners time in less than three years of prison police self-acceptance score significantly lower than practitioners of 4-10 years (42.96 ± 5.92,45.42 ± 6.042,44.2 ± 5.270, F = 3.890, P <0.05); practitioners 4-10 years prison police self-esteem scores were lower than the less than three years and not less than ten years (20.40 ± 4.26,18.90 ± 4.39,20.09 ± 3.80 F = 3.523, P <0.05). Prison police of the different nature of the work in a hostile factor scores differences were significant (P <0.05); different sex prison police in somatization, anxiety, hostility, psychosis, sleep and food, SCL-90 total score, perceived stress factor of family support, social support, self-acceptance score differences were significant (P <0.05 or P <0.01); prison police in different marital status score of perceived stress, negative coping, family support the difference was significant (P <0.05 or P <0.01); prison police in different degrees of somatization, anxiety, hostility, terror, psychotic, eating sleep total score of perceived stress, self-esteem, self-acceptance factor, self-acceptance The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05 or P <0.01) in the total score. Conclusion: Prison Police mental health is not optimistic, somatization, psychosis factor higher than the social norm. Mental health and psychological characteristics behave differently at different stages of practitioners, and the influence of factors such as gender, education level, marital status and the nature of the work. Tip the different characteristics of the the different practitioners stages Prison Police, we should carry out targeted interventions, will it be possible to raise the overall level of mental health of the prison police.
|