|
The East China Sea, China and Japan for a long time, and a further intensification of the trend in recent years. In the course of the study in the past, scholars focus more of the specific dispute, and has targeted many practical solutions. Comparatively speaking, this article aimed at the analysis of the two countries from the point of view of the sea power dispute that these ongoing friction behind the intense competition of the national interests of sea power, sea power, if not to ease the dispute, it is difficult to fundamentally solve the specific maritime dispute. And historical inductive method used as the starting point, the interests of value profiling method, comparative analysis and other research methods attempt to abstract from the surface of the dispute between the two countries eventually chased interest demands. The first part of the article focuses on Sea Power founders Mahan's concept of sea power, and thought after Mahan's sea power during the development process goes back further introduced on the basis of some of the features of sea power, in reference to the domestic and foreign scholars for discussion of the meaning of sea power, suggest that sea power has marine rights and marine forces as a means to point ocean. marine powers for the purpose of sexual rights connotation. The second part of the article to the sea power of the first section summarizes the elements as the basis for a start on trying to resolve dispute the nature of the underlying problem of the East China Sea surface from four aspects. First, the Sino-Japanese East China Sea dispute caused by the different concepts of sea power, sea power thinking \influence \Secondly, with regard to the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands vesting dispute that the existing evidence for China has sovereignty over it more favorable; controversy on the issue of the delimitation of the East China Sea that should be applied to \And specified based on the substance of the dispute between the two countries in the sphere of influence of sea power, sea power economic competition for the reality reflects, because in these two areas of interest related to the survival and development of the two countries' sea power, and thus not only in the short term will not be resolved, but also because of new developments repeatedly. Once again, the exploitation of oil and gas field in Chunxiao dispute is the concentrated expression of both China and Japan to compete in the economic sea power, by its very nature is, including oil and gas resources, such as biological, mineral, fresh water resources development and utilization of the fight, reflects The sea power connotation focus by a period of great geographical discoveries \Finally, the recent collision in Japan alluding to the differences in the two sides on the smooth realization of the right to protect the sea marine forces, discussed the focus from the major component of the marine forces of the naval forces, scientific research, law enforcement forces. The third part of the article analyzes the revelation of the Sino-Japanese sea power struggle to bring the construction of China's sea power. Although China is in dispute with Japan \Therefore, from the point of view of the domestic, we have to fully understand the substance of specific disputes in the East China Sea is a sea power struggle, and establish the concept of maritime power, and want to improve the relevant maritime legislation to enhance the capacity of scientific and technological innovation, consolidate coastal defense forces, strengthening marine law enforcement and so many ways to take measures to strengthen their overall strength of sea power, to further improve the external competitiveness of the sea power. The fourth part discusses China's foreign strategy should be taken in solving the Sino-Japanese sea power struggle. Principle from the point of view of the deal with the parties to the dispute, Japan, in terms of ideology to strengthen their communication and exchange of sea power, to adhere to the primary ownership, putting aside disputes and jointly develop \sea ??power, cooperation and win-win atmosphere. From the treatment of the international community, the external impact of the angle, we avoid the Sea Right Disputes over-internationalization, prevent big country interference factors further intervention of the premise, to be fully draw on international resolve involving sea power of specific interest in the dispute of a reasonable program to mid-term Japanese sea power win solution.
|