Dissertation > Excellent graduate degree dissertation topics show

The Contradiction and Trend of the Theory of Intersubjectivity

Author: YuanDongJun
Tutor: SuXiaoHong
School: East China University of Political Science
Course: Legal Theory
Keywords: Intersubjectivity Lacan Habermas Contradiction Coexist
CLC: B01
Type: Master's thesis
Year: 2008
Downloads: 245
Quote: 0
Read: Download Dissertation

Abstract

The direction of this research is the general concern of Western academia intersubjectivity. Although this problem has caused in our discussion, but far from the degree of attention. From the national conditions, China is still in the modern society, but still left some characteristics of the pre-modern society, as the impact of Western post-modern thought and the trend of globalization, but also inevitably fusion postmodern society characterized . Therefore, it can be said that China's current situation is pre-modern, modern and post-modern intertwined. Although some scholars believe that, under current conditions, is not suitable to talk about the post-modern problems. Nowadays there is such a worry: Modernity has not yet been established, will have to be post-modern destroyed. Despite such worries are not unfounded, but the post-modern invasion fact can not be avoided. Interwoven currently pre-modern, modern and post-modern society, simply evaded postmodern, and not necessarily conducive to the modern building. Therefore, the paper argues that the main issues, as is considered to be independent and modern social problems, it is the best able to solve the crisis of modernity, modernity and post modernity conflict and contradiction between the fundamental way they should be the attention it deserves. However, between the theory of intersubjectivity, longstanding heated debate, the contradiction between theory are also evident. Therefore, this article intersubjectivity mainly from the following aspects to inspect: 1, according to a long-term controversy of Western academia, intersubjectivity theory is divided into two different research approaches to reveal the contradictions between and analyze the root causes; 2 main theory of two contradictory approaches, each select one representative figure of the theory are introduced and discussed, and compare the two sides at the contradiction; intersubjectivity theory contradictions introduction of modern internal contradictions roots, and to find the solution path; paper involved in the field of philosophy, psychology, linguistics, sociology multiple ideas and viewpoints to intersubjectivity problems at the micro level and macro level at the same time understand, trying to find a new research perspective, so that the intersubjectivity theory out its limitations, be able to solve the real problem, its vitality can be maintained for long. In addition to the introduction, is divided into four chapters. The introductory part of the analysis of intersubjectivity, in the analysis of the current situation and problems of intersubjectivity Institute exists to reveal the meaning of intersubjectivity summarized this paper clues. The first chapter of the concept and scope of intersubjectivity introduced and defined, and intersubjectivity Scope, and finally reveals the contradiction between research intersubjective theory. Chapter II of departure from the the intersubjectivity negativity approach, a the poststructuralist master Lacan theory is divided into three sections. Lacanian thought in three parts (three stages): imagine domain, a symbol of the domain, the real domain classification. Lacan's theory involves ontological problem, through the introduction of this chapter, can also be caused by the reflection of their own, and even the reflection of society. This is also the one of the reasons cited Rula Kang theory. Chapter departure from the approach of intersubjectivity sure intersubjectivity practice problems introduced by epistemological level dimension. This chapter is divided into four sections, the first on the concept of the living world to explore, including the introduction of Mead's symbolic interactionism carried out in-depth analysis of the internal structure of the living world and the external associated. On this basis, Habermas divided into four types of communicative action, communicative action reasonable reasons revealed, and the introduction of the principle of Piaget's genetic epistemology, looking for the differentiation of the three worlds, and communicative action epistemological basis. Chapter IV as the above responses and a summary of the full text, is divided into two sections. The first section analyzes the problem of intersubjectivity the underlying causes of the conflicts and controversies second section attempts to observe the existing contradictions in the inter-subjectivity, a new perspective and try to put forward a solution.

Related Dissertations

CLC: > Philosophy, religion > Philosophical theories > Basic Problems of Philosophy
© 2012 www.DissertationTopic.Net Mobile